<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic Lumix DMC-FX50K</title>
	<link>http://www.camera-news.com/blog/2006/12/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k/</link>
	<description>Digital Camera News and Reviews</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 02:00:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Camera-news</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-news.com/blog/2006/12/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k/#comment-2871</link>
		<dc:creator>Camera-news</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 02:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.camera-news.com/blog/2006/12/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k/#comment-2871</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href="http://www.camera-news.com/auction/index.php?q=fx50&#38;catid=29997" rel="nofollow"&gt; Check eBay prices on the FX50&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.camera-news.com/auction/index.php?q=fx50&amp;catid=29997" rel="nofollow"> Check eBay prices on the FX50</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucjian</title>
		<link>http://www.camera-news.com/blog/2006/12/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k/#comment-2781</link>
		<dc:creator>lucjian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.camera-news.com/blog/2006/12/11/panasonic-lumix-dmc-fx50k/#comment-2781</guid>
		<description>A good camera. Small enough to fit in a shirt pocket, it is ready within 2 seconds to take a picture. Pluses: big viewscreen, bright and sharp. Good battery life. Uses SD card. Controls are easy and menus accessible. Pictures are good, but all cameras take good pictures these days.
Bad: Optics are limited, no real wide angle, zoom is limited. Has optical image stabilization (as opposed to digital) so it only works with the optical zoom. When you really need stabilization, at extreme zooms, its not there. Has trouble focusing in relatively low light.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good camera. Small enough to fit in a shirt pocket, it is ready within 2 seconds to take a picture. Pluses: big viewscreen, bright and sharp. Good battery life. Uses SD card. Controls are easy and menus accessible. Pictures are good, but all cameras take good pictures these days.<br />
Bad: Optics are limited, no real wide angle, zoom is limited. Has optical image stabilization (as opposed to digital) so it only works with the optical zoom. When you really need stabilization, at extreme zooms, its not there. Has trouble focusing in relatively low light.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
